Legal Opinion

John Harvey Adamson v. James G. Ricketts

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 18, 1985No. 84-2069PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:

In this death penalty appeal we are confronted by these issues: (1) was the error in the admission of certain evidence in the underlying trial a confrontation clause violation and, if so, was it harmful; (2) what is the standard of review in the district court and this court in passing on the sufficiency of the evidence; (3) is the death penalty as applied under Arizona law unconstitutional because it takes the aggravating circumstances question from the jury and places it before the judge; (4) is the Arizona heinous, cruel or depraved aggravating factor…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ricketts v. AdamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. John Harvey Adamson v. James G. Ricketts, Director, Arizona Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. DunlapCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API