Legal Opinion

B.R. v. Blinken

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 11, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2022-1908Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA B.R., et al., Plaintiffs, V. No. 22-cv-1908 MARCO RUBIO, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs are an American couple and their adopted Nepali daughter, B.R. They sued the Secretary of State and the Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”), seeking to compel USCIS to adjudicate an I-600 petition, which, if granted, would allow BR. to immigrate to the United States. Defendants now move to dismiss the case. Mot. to Dismiss (“Defs.” MTD”), ECF No. 15. For the reasons set forth below, the court will GRANT…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API