Legal Opinion

Donald v. Commercial Bank

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1923No. 23364PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSykes, P. J.

The complainants in their bill seek to have declared invalid a sale of certain lands under a deed of trust. Among other provisions in the deed of, trust is one which states that the. trustee may sell “after giving notice for three consecutive weeks in some newspaper published in said county.” The notice was published in the newspaper-on January 12th, 19th, and 26th, and the sale was made on February 2d. A demurrer Was sustained to the bill; the court in effect thereby holding that proper notice by publication was given and a valid sale held. *583Section 2772, Code of 1906, section 2276,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maris v. LindseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Planters Mercantile Co. v. BraxtonMississippi Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Hall v. CassidyMississippi Supreme Court · 1852
  4. Hattiesburg Grocery Co. v. TompkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Mitchell v. WoodsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brown v. RileyMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Osborne v. NeblettCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
  3. Crump v. TuckerMississippi Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Combs v. AdamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Osborne v. NeblettCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API