Legal Opinion

In Matter of Harkins

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 19, 1931No. Docket No. 1644Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM CASE.

THE COURT.

[1] It is the claim of the petitioner that the evidence is insufficient to support the order. The petitioner has presented no transcript of the testimony. The writ is denied under the authority of In re Rasmussen, 56 Cal.App. 368 [205 P. 72], and Brune v. Superior Court, 113 Cal.App. 21 [297 P. 566].

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re RasmusssenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  2. Brune v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931