Legal Opinion · Dissent

County of Broome v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 1982Published

1DissentMeyer, J.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the order of Special Term should be reinstated,1 the county having failed to produce evidentiary proof sufficient to require a trial on the issue of care, custody or control within the meaning of the policy exclusion.

The fallacy in the reasoning of the Appellate Division, adopted by the majority, is in its conclusion, on the law, that the written agreement between the county and the sponsors of the bridal show limited the county’s security obligation to the day of the performance. The agreement required the sponsors to reimburse the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Pimpinello v. Swift & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Sturges Manufacturing Co. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Dubay v. Trans-America InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. Employees Mutual Liability Ins. v. Puryear Wood Products Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API