Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Public Administrator of the County of Bronx

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1968PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Eager, J. P.

Sound judicial reasoning, in light of recent decisions of our courts, requires the sustaining of the defense of res judicata to the causes of action of the plaintiff Herman Schwartz. Defendant’s motion to dismiss such causes of action should have been granted.

The complaint sets forth three causes of action—one for the personal injuries of Herman Schwartz, the second for injuries sustained by his wife, and the third for recovery by Herman Schwartz for loss of services and medical expenses resulting from his wife’s injuries. The plaintiffs’ injuries resulted from an automobile…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Ripley v. StorerNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Glaser v. HuetteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  4. Glaser v. HuetteNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Hollenbeck v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. of Hartford, ConnecticutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland Insurance v. Fred S. James & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API