Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Dolenz v. Shaughnessy

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 5, 1952No. 22530_1PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASE, Circuit Judge.

The primary question presented by this appeal is whether a failure by the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization, acting as the duly designated delegate of the Attorney General, to find that a de-portable alien would be physically persecuted in the country to which he has been deported is a compliance with the applicable law. The subordinate questions are (1) whether the appellant was given a hearing consonant with the requirements of due process; and (2) whether, on the proof presented, the delegate of the Attorney General was required to make findings of fact,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harisiades v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Carlson v. LandonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. United States Ex Rel. Tisi v. TodSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Dolenz v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  2. Bruno Blazina v. E. P. Bouchard, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service, New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  3. Keiser v. BellDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. In re Marín BáezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959
  5. United States Ex Rel. Tomislav Kordic and Venka Kordic v. P. A. Esperdy, as District Director of the Immigration and NaturalizationserviceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API