Legal Opinion

Leslie v. Walrath

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1887Published

AppeaL from an order of the Chautauqua County Court denying the defendants’ motion for a retaxation of costs

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, P. J.:

Action on a promissory note. The plaintiff claimed to recover •the sum of $275 with interest from the: 4th of September, 1884, besides costs. The defendants set np a counterclaim, and before trial served an offer of judgment “for the*sum of One hundred and •fifty dollars, with costs to date.” The offer was dated. It was not .accepted, a trial was had, and the plaintiff obtained a verdict for the sum of $112.50.

'The plaintiff’s counsel contends that the offer was ineffectual by .reason of the limitation imposed by it in respect to costs, its effect being, if accepted, to subject…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Riggs v. . WaydellNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API