Legal Opinion

Wm. Andress, Jr., and Devona C. Andress v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 13, 1970No. 28415_1PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Per curiam

William Andress, Jr., a lawyer, contends that part of his social expenses are deductible from his gross income. Because the Canons of Ethics prohibit the legal profession from advertising or soliciting, he maintains that soeial and entertainment activities are an ordinary and necessary expense of his professional operations.

For the reasons set forth in the Tax Court below, Andress v. Commissioner, 1969, 51 T.C. 863, we conclude that Andress’s expenses were entertainment expenses which he failed to qualify under section 274(a) (1) and (d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

The judgment of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Andress v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Cam F. Dowell, Jr., Evelyn Dowell and Hillcrest State Bank, Plaintiffs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Rutz v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  3. Philip Handelman and Esther Handelman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  4. Israelson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1973
  5. Hippodrome Oldsmobile, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API