State v. Garcia
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VIGIL, Chief Judge.
{1} The question presented in this case is whether an emergency medical technician (EMT) is authorized to draw blood for the purpose of determining its alcohol or drug content under the Implied Consent Act, NMSA 1978, Sections 66-8-105 to -112, (1978, as amended through 2015). We conclude no such authority exists and affirm the order of the district court suppressing the results of Defendant’s blood test.
I. BACKGROUND
{2} State Police Officers Bernal and Robles were dispatched to a head-on collision on NM 404 near the Texas border. Officer Bernal encountered the two…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Price v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. GardnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Cavazos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
- State v. VaughnNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. AdamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. AdamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. FranklinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. WarfordNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.