Van v. Unifund CCR, LLC.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Petitioner challenges the denial of his verified motion to disqualify the trial judge. We conclude that the motion was legally sufficient1 and, accordingly, grant the writ of prohibition. See Barnett v. Barnett, 727 So.2d 311, 312 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (“While it is well-settled that a judge may form mental impressions and opinions *523during the course of hearing evidence, he or she may not prejudge the case.”).
WRIT GRANTED.
SAWAYA, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.. In determining the legal sufficiency of the motion, we must presume the facts alleged to be true. Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(f).
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Barnett v. BarnettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wolfson v. WolfsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Mills v. Kinnan, KinnanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
- Pumphrey v. Kinnan, KinnanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
- Wolfson v. WolfsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015