Legal Opinion

Westfall v. Albert

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 26, 1903Published

Debt, on a bond. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Chables G. Neely, Judge presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1902.

1Opinion of the Court

Hr. J nsTioE Windes

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellant, the obligee in a bond under seal made by the appellees, brought an action of debt thereon against appellees, alleging breach of the conditions therein contained. The bond recites that appellee Albert had leased certain premises, describing them, and was desirous of erecting thereon a bathing establishment, driving piles in the ground therefor and making other alterations and improvements, and that he claimed to own or hold some right, title or interest in the premises. Then follows the condition of the bond, which is:

“How,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Board of Directors of Chicago Theo. Seminary v. People ex rel. RaymondIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Pease v. DittoIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Union National Bank v. PostAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  4. World's Columbian Exposition Co. v. LehighAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  5. Perisho v. PerishoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API