Legal Opinion

State v. Krapff

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 11, 1905No. 13,993Published

Error from Russell district court; James H. Reeder, judge.

1Per curiam

The state did not help its case by using the deposition of Peter Krapff, the owner of the property. It was necessary to show knowledge on his part that the premises were used for unlawful purposes. (Cordes v. The State, 37 Kan. 48, 14 Pac. 493). The deposition of the owner tended to disprove this.

The judgment is affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cordes v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887