Nevada National Leasing Co. v. Hereford
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REYNOSO, J.
Nevada National Leasing Company (Nevada National), as owner, repossessed several pieces of heavy construction equipment. Thereafter, it sold the equipment at an auction. Unbeknownst to any other bidders, the owner and the auctioneer agreed that the owner would bid on the auctioned items to increase the sales prices. Does the California Uniform Commercial Code permit such a secret arrangement? We hold that it does not.
Under the California Uniform Commercial Code, section 2328, 1 the buyer at an auction for the sale of goods is protected from undisclosed, competitive bidding…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Strutt v. Ontario Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Rosener v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- Peterson v. HornblowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Westlands Water Dist. v. Amoco Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Dunlap v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Westlands Water District v. Amoco Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.