Legal Opinion

McClure v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 6, 2013No. 4D13-1220PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtForst, J.

Petitioner, Judith McClure, a plaintiff in a slip and fall negligence case, seeks cer-tiorari review of an order compelling her deposition prior to the production of a store security video of the slip and fall. She contends that the court’s order departs from the essential requirements of law based upon Target Corp. v. Vogel, 41 So.3d 962 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). As set forth below, we deny the writ, finding that the trial court’s order was not an abuse of judicial discretion and, as such, not contrary to our Target opinion.

Subsequent to filing suit against the Publix grocery store, McClure filed…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Fleetwood Homes of Florida, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. Williams v. OkenSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  3. Dodson v. PersellSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  4. Target Corp. v. VogelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bus. Telecomms. Servs., Inc. v. MadrigalDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  2. Bus. Telecomms. Servs., Inc. v. MadrigalDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  3. State v. MossDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API