Legal Opinion

Heimerle v. Village of Bronxville

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAldrich, J.

These two actions were tried together. Both involve the same questions. Both are brought to obtain the same relief. In the Heimerle action the plaintiffs are the owners in fee of the real property in question. In the Benedict action the plaintiffs are the lessees of the premises in possession under a lease from the owners, containing an option to purchase. Each action seeks to have it adjudged that the premises in question may be lawfully used for the purposes of an undertaking parlor or funeral home, and to restrain any interference with such use by the defendants, etc. The questions…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Rowland v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. People v. . RingeNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Osborn v. City of ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. Village of OwegoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  2. Eggert v. Board of AppealsIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Jones v. Chapel Hill, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  4. Robin v. Village of HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Jones v. Chapel Hill, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API