In re the Probate of the Will of Beatty
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Hazleton, S.
The question with which we are concerned is: Can a contestant in a probate proceeding, who failed to timely file her demand for a jury trial be relieved of her omission and be permitted to file nunc pro tunc amended objections containing a demand for a jury trial. The objections without the demand for a jury trial were filed on April 12, 1954, and thereafter as soon as the mistake was discovered, the demand for a jury trial was filed on April 22d. Petitioner then moved to strike out the demand, while contestant countered with a motion to file amended objections nunc pro tunc as of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schwartz v. Sunlight Apartments, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of HolmeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Estate of SchneierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- In re the Probate of the Will of BeattyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- In re the Estate of MirskyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
- In re the Estate of SchneierNew York Surrogate's Court · 1979