Legal Opinion

In re the Probate of the Will of Beatty

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 11, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hazleton, S.

The question with which we are concerned is: Can a contestant in a probate proceeding, who failed to timely file her demand for a jury trial be relieved of her omission and be permitted to file nunc pro tunc amended objections containing a demand for a jury trial. The objections without the demand for a jury trial were filed on April 12, 1954, and thereafter as soon as the mistake was discovered, the demand for a jury trial was filed on April 22d. Petitioner then moved to strike out the demand, while contestant countered with a motion to file amended objections nunc pro tunc as of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Sunlight Apartments, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of HolmeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of SchneierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. In re the Probate of the Will of BeattyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  3. In re the Estate of MirskyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
  4. In re the Estate of SchneierNew York Surrogate's Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API