Legal Opinion

Wolfe v. Herlihy

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 27, 1950No. 16421PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This Court is in accord with the result of the order of Honorable J. M. Brailsford, Jr., Circuit Judge (which relates solely to the second cause of action), and directs that it be published herewith. But in publishing same, let the word “celotax” in folio 346 be correctly spelled “celotex”; the word “advertising” folio 350, changed to “adverting”; and the word “savowed,” second line, third paragraph on page 88, folio 351, changed to “disavowed.” It is obvious that all of these errors occurred in copying the order, or in printing same. Also, in publishing the order, omit the third sentence in…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wolfe v. HerlihySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API