Legal Opinion

United States v. Luis Juarez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 24, 2012No. 09-20764PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Circuit Judge:

The defendant-appellant (Juarez) appeals the district court’s decision on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Juarez’s counsel failed to independently research and investigate the derivative citizenship defense. Citizenship is a defense to the alienage element of both crimes to which Juarez pled guilty. Juarez claims that his counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial when counsel advised him to enter guilty pleas without consulting available jurisprudence to make an informed or competent decision. For the following reasons, we REVERSE and REMAND.

Facts…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. George Alvarez v. City of BrownsvilleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  2. Heard v. AddisonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. Adam ShepherdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. Brian PheaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  5. Evaristo Gonzalez Gonzalez v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API