Legal Opinion

Davis v. Thomaston

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 3, 1983No. 81-452PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs, Susie Lee Daniel Thomaston and Jane Daniel Sims, initiated this cause on August 29, 1980, against certain of the heirs of Leila Daniel Dirickson, seeking the reformation of a deed due to alleged inaccuracies in the legal description of property conveyed thereby. Defendants, Mary D. Davis, Doris D. Stanford, G.W. Dirickson, Ethel Conrad, Hattie Kirk, Ross Daniel, Jr., Delilah Deavers, Gail Cowan, and Lana Jean Swatek, filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' cause, which was denied.

Defendants next answered Plaintiffs' allegations, denying the material averments of the complaint, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cougar Min. Co. v. MINERAL LAND & MIN. CONSULT. INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Raidt v. CraneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. Ellis v. StickneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  4. Duncan v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  5. Merrill v. MerrillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Falkner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  2. Stone v. Gulf American Fire and Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Fouts v. BeallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Kelly v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  5. McBrayer v. Hokes Bluff Auto PartsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API