Legal Opinion · Dissent

Syracuse University v. Games 2002, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 19, 2010Published

1Dissent

Carni, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent, because in my view plaintiff established as a matter of law that it was not negligent, that it did not control the injury producing work, and that its liability to the injured employee was vicarious only. I therefore conclude that plaintiff is entitled to contractual indemnification from defendant, Games 2002, LLC (Games 2002), and would reverse the order insofar as appealed from.

In 2002 plaintiff entered into a written agreement with the Games 2002 concerning the use of the Carrier Dome and other facilities on plaintiffs campus. The agreement…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Colyer v. K Mart Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Colozzo v. National Center Foundation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Doyne v. Barry, Bette & Led Duke, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Torres v. LPE Land Development & Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. JCS Controls, Inc. v. StaceyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API