Legal Opinion

Kitzman v. Postier Kruger Co. Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 27, 1939No. 31,872PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Plaintiff sued for an accounting. Issues were duly made and trial had. The court’s findings were for defendant. Plaintiff moved for leave to take further testimony, for amended findings, or, in the alternative, for a new trial.- The motion was denied except for certain minor changes in the findings. Judgment was thereupon entered in conformity with the findings as amended, and plaintiff appeals.

The facts may be summarized as follows: In 1917 West and Postier, copartners, were engaged in the garage business at Rochester. Plaintiff had an exclusive agency for the sale…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Surety Co. v. WinslowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  2. McAlpine v. MillenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. Harms v. ProehlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rehnberg v. Minnesota Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. Appletree Square I Ltd. Partnership v. Investmark, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Lipinski v. LipinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. H. F. Shepherdson Co. v. Central Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Straus v. StrausSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API