Legal Opinion

Malaga v. Holmes

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County

Decided February 3, 1936No. 83Published

1Opinion of the Court

McCluskey, J.,

This matter comes before the court on a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted.

On June 14, 1931, the plaintiff Ruth Malaga was injured. She was struck by an automobile driven by the defendant, Robert Logan Holmes. On August 2, 1932, the plaintiffs commenced action of trespass against the defendant. The statement of claim was filed and summons issued as of no. 84, September term, 1932. The prothonotary delivered both the writ of summons and the Statement of claim to the Sheriff of Northampton County for service. On the return day for said writ the Sheriff of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bovaird & Seyfang Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Grindle v. BunkerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API