Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Watkins

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1952No. 2841PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LE BARON, J.

This is an action in assumpsit. It arose out of a landlord-tenant relationship and is brought by the plaintiff as tenant against the defendant as landlord. It seeks to recover in full all the money paid as the agreed rental for a room in the defendant’s residence, which the plaintiff occupied for a period of twenty-two months on a month- to-month basis and on which no maximum-rent ceiling had been established. That room was subject to rent control and constituted a housing accommodation which had “not been rented on May 27, 1941, nor within the preceding…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. LeBarron v. City of HarvardNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  2. In Re Estate of MonfortSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  3. Goo Yee v. RosenbergHawaii Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. FosterHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State v. Woodhall.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. FosterHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State v. Woodhall.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API