Gilewicz v. Goldberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Constantine Gilewicz, from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, borough of Brooklyn, in favor of the defendant, entered on the 31st day of October, 1901, dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
Woodward, J.:
¡Nathan Bockscliitsky recovered a judgment against the plaintiff in this action in the Municipal Court for groceries sold and delivered. An execution was duly issued pursuant to said judgment to the defendant, a city marshal,, who levied upon a certain horse, bar. ness and wagon. The plaintiff, thereupon, brought this action to recover a horse, harness and wagon, on the ground that the said property was exempt from levy, and sale. Upon the trial the learned court decided that the plaintiff had failed to establish a cause of action and dismissed the complaint, with ten dollars…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Twinam v. SwartNew York Supreme Court · 1871
- Field v. Ingreham, New York County Courts1896
- In re KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
3Cited by3 opinions
- Balanoff v. NiosiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Tuckman v. HaywardNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Zadar Construction & Woodworking, Inc. v. Charter Woodworking Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990