Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jenkins v. Greene

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 23, 2010No. Docket 09-3623-prPublished

1Dissent

B.D. PARKER, JR., Circuit Judge,

dissenting:

Because I believe that Jenkins’s petition was entitled to the benefits of equitable tolling, I respectfully dissent. The majority’s approach in my view incorporates two significant errors. It incorrectly analyzes a confusing body of New York case law dealing with the procedural prerequisites to pursuing an ineffective assistance of counsel claim in state court. And more importantly, it fails meaningfully to engage in the equitable analysis required by Holland v. Florida, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 2549, 177 L.Ed.2d 130 (2010).

*306Belot v. Burge sets out a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. Gerald GordonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. Bernard Cullen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API