Legal Opinion

Yancey v. Southern Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 24, 1959No. 37612Published

1Opinion of the Court

99 Ga. App. 493 (1959)

109 S.E.2d 300

YANCEY

v.

SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY.

37612.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided April 24, 1959.

Rehearing Denied May 6, 1959.

Bullock, Yancey & Mitchell, for plaintiff in error.

Matthews, Maddox, Walton & Smith, John W. Maddox, contra.

TOWNSEND, Judge.

1. As a matter of law, the presence of a piece of gravel on a railroad crossing is not negligence and the trial court did not err in sustaining the special grounds of demurrer wherein this matter was alleged as a basis for recovery. The presence of a piece of gravel is alleged elsewhere in the petition and is material…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. KeatingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  2. Glover v. City Council of AugustaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  3. Idlett v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. DumasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  5. Pollard v. BoatwrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API