State v. Quick

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Magie, J.

The proceedings brought up in this case were commenced by attachment in a justice’s court. The case shows that after the writ issued, Morris, the defendant in attachment, filed with the justice certain affidavits, which he claimed set forth facts which would render the attachment illegal and *309void. The justice thereupon proceeded to try the facts as required by the sixty-ninth section of the Attachment act. Rep., p. 55. Morris produced no witnesses, but relied on said affidavits. Quick, the plaintiff in attachment, produced witnesses, who…