Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Crutcher

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1999Published

1Dissent

*303FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, Justice,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision in this case. In my view, the appel-lee had been arrested at the time his motorcycle was searched; therefore, the search was valid as incident to a lawful arrest. Even assuming, however, that the appellee had not been technically arrested at the time the search occurred, the search and arrest were substantially contemporaneous; therefore, the search was constitutionally valid as incident to a lawful arrest. Accordingly, I would reverse the judgments of the lower courts which ordered suppression of…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API