Salinas v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRYAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an action under the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Texas (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. Tex. art. 8306 et seq.) to recover damages for injury to an employee. At the close of the evidence, the trial court, being of opinion that the evidence submitted was insufficient to prove the injury complained of, directed a verdict for the defendant insurance carrier. Plaintiffs appeal on the ground that it was error to take the ease away from the jury. •
Salinas, the employee who it is alleged was injured, was a cement finisher, and had been employed for a number of years in cement…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1916
- Barron v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'nTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Brown v. EnglishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
3Cited by9 opinions
- Grain Handling Co. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. WeatherfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Jones.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. NeasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- Strawn v. Travelers Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.