Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Crenshaw

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided January 22, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-437Published

1Opinion of the Court

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON WAYNE REAUD’S MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER TEX. CIY. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 27.001 et. seq.

KEITH F. GIBLIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, on November 10, 2015, the District Court referred this matter to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for *767pretrial management. See Order (doc. # 22). Pending before the Court for purposes of this report is Defendant Wayne Reaud’s (“Reaud”) Motion to Dismiss Under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 27.001 et…

2Cases cited25 opinions

Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.