Georgia Ports Authority v. Harris
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
HUNSTEIN, Justice.
We granted certiorari in this case to determine whether the Court of Appeals correctly concluded that the ante litem notice sent by appellee William Harris via Federal Express to appellant Georgia Ports Authority complied with the delivery and receipt requirements in OCGA § 50-21-26 (a) (2). Georgia Ports Auth. v. Harris, 243 Ga. App. 508 (1) (b) (533 SE2d 404) (2000). Finding no error in that ruling, we affirm.
1. As an initial matter, we address the motion filed by GPA to disqualify Thomas C. Bordeaux, Jr., counsel for Harris, on the basis that Mr. Bordeaux’s membership in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Georgia Department of Human Resources v. SistrunkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Norris v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Georgia Ports Authority v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Georgia State Board of Pharmacy v. LovvornSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
3Cited by26 opinions
- Cummings v. Georgia Department of Juvenile JusticeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Donohoe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Donohoe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Farmer v. Georgia Department of Corrections.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Lewis v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.