Fine Fashions, Inc. v. Gross

I would reverse the judgment of the District Court for the reason that its fact-findings that “The true intent of the parties was that Fine Fashions, Inc. would pledge its credit rating to guarantee payment for the cloth and that title would vest in Penn Garment Company”, and “title to the cloth in question was always in Penn Garment Company” are clearly erroneous.

The marital relationship is not established by the circumstance of their engagement but by the covenant of marriage which binds the betrothed together in the holy state of matrimony.

Here the majority, as did the District Court,…