Legal Opinion

People v. Matos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 23, 2013PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dwyer, J.), imposed September 22, 2010, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

*891Inasmuch as the record does not demonstrate that the defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was made knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently, it may not be enforced (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-265 [2011]). Nevertheless, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Angiolillo, Balkin and Sgroi,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. People v. BradshawNew York Court of Appeals · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. BynumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API