Legal Opinion

Lejeune v. Stamm-Scheele, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1994No. 93-536PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

^SAUNDERS, Judge.

In this workers’ compensation appeal the sole issue is whether the hearing officer erred in allowing the employer to offset the plaintiffs workers’ compensation benefits pursuant to LSA-R.S. 23:1225(A) without a hearing.

FACTS

Plaintiff, Raymond Lejeune, was injured on February 4, 1986, while in the course and scope of his employment with defendant-ap-pellee, Stamm-Scheele, Inc. Stamm-Scheele, Inc. carried workers’ compensation insurance with Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, defendant-appellee, herein. Plaintiff was paid weekly compensation at the rate *328of $254.00 per week…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holmes v. International Paper Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Domingue v. Hartford Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Necaise v. AC Co. of South Louisiana, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. LaFleurLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lee v. M & O, INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. LeBlanc v. Lake Charles Dodge, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Westbrook v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API