Legal Opinion
Trimed, Inc. v. Sherwood Medical Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 12, 1991No. Civ. A. MJG-87-1183PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, Senior District Judge.
Sherwood Medical Company (“Sherwood”) moves for a Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (“j.n.o.v.”) under Fed. R.Civ.P. 50 or in the alternative for a new trial under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59.
“The question to be resolved when deciding a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is whether there is evidence on which a jury can properly base a verdict.” Lust v. Clark Equip. Co., 792 F.2d 436, 437 (4th Cir.1986). In determining whether to grant a motion for j.n.o.v., the nonmoving party must be given the benefit of every legitimate inference in its…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United States v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Frank E. WILHELM, Karl F. Gatlin and Harold L. Kogut, Appellees, v. BLUE BELL, INC., AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- John S. Mays v. Pioneer Lumber Corporation, a West Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- United States Football League v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- First Union National Bank v. Steele Software Systems Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Trimed, Incorporated, a Maryland Corporation v. Sherwood Medical Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Baron Financial Corp. v. NatanzonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
- Airport System International, Inc. v. Airsys Atm, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- Corsair Special Situations Fund, L.P. v. Engineered Framing Sys., Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.