Legal Opinion

Pope v. Harris

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided February 13, 1981No. C-3-79-333PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE IN ITS ENTIRETY; PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OVERRULED; DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUSTAINED; JUDGMENT TO DEFENDANT; ENTRY OF JUDGMENT; TERMINATION ENTRY

RICE, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The captioned cause is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s motion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), seeking a review of the Magistrate’s recommendation that Defendant’s motion for summary judgment be granted, and that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be denied. Plaintiff has submitted a memorandum in support of her motion,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. John G. Myers v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  5. Mrs. Willie C. Kirkland v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Naberhaus-Burke, Inc. v. Butt & Head, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
  2. United States ex rel. Veal v. DeRobertisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API