Thomas v. State

Appellant appeals the circuit court’s denial of his 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We find merit in appellant’s argument that the circuit court erred when it granted appellant an evidentiary hearing, but failed to make findings of fact and conclusions of law respecting the evidence and argument presented at said hearing. We affirm, without comment, as to each of appellant’s other claims on appeal.

In the 3.850 motion, filed below, appellant alleged his trial counsel was ineffec-*57five for failing to request an accomplice jury instruction. The circuit court granted appellant an…