Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Albright

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1933No. Appeal 89PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

This is an appeal; from an order making absolute a rule to show cause why a judgment entered by confession should not be opened. The defendant alleged as a basis of his application for relief that his signature to the note authorizing the confession of judgment was forged, and this was denied in an answer by the plaintiff.

In December, 1930, Paul B. Albright, who was engaged in the insurance business with his father, J. W. Albright, presented to the plaintiff bank a judgment note for $1,800 purporting to be signed by himself and his father. The note Was renewed three times…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morgan v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. O'Herron v. GrayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  3. Pennsylvania Railroad Company's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1878
  4. Austen v. MarzolfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Schomaker v. DeanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Funds for Business Growth, Inc. v. MaraldoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Coffin v. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Johnson v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API