Legal Opinion
United States v. Schultz
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided February 23, 1996No. CR 95-3011PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND.1344
II. LEGAL ANALYSIS .1347
A. The “Aceeptanee-Of-Responsibility” Guideline.1347
B. Judicial Interpretations And Applications.1348
1. Burdens, standards, and tests.1348
2. Applications.1350
C. “Acceptance Of Responsibility” In This Case.1352
1. Acceptance of responsibility in “gambling business” cases.1352
2. Application of principles and tests.1354
III. CONCLUSION.1355
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING SENTENCING OF DEFENDANT SCHULTZ
BENNETT, District Judge.
This sentencing demonstrates the painful and Hobsonian tension created by the United States Sentencing…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- United States v. LuchtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. SmaldoneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. David Big Crow, United States of America v. David Big CrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. James Fremont Farmer, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. KaramCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Stephen Erhart, Also Known as Stephen Anthony ErhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. NguyenDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2002
- United States v. Stephen ErhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005