Legal Opinion

Grossman v. Target Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 24, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Target Corporation appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated October 29, 2010, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the motion of the defendant Target Corporation for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it is granted.

*1165The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Basso v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Cupo v. KarfunkelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Tagle v. JakobNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Peralta v. HenriquezNew York Court of Appeals · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arsenault v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. King v. Cornell UniversityNew York Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Arsenault v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API