Legal Opinion
Davidson v. Ambrozewicz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 17, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMugglin, J.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Clemente, J.), entered July 6, 2004 in Sullivan County, which denied defendants’ motion to renew.
On a previous appeal, we affirmed summary judgment to plaintiff on his Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action (12 AD3d 902 [2004]). Immediately after Supreme Court granted this motion, defendants moved to reargue, claiming that Supreme Court had overlooked facts with respect to the recalcitrant worker defense. This motion was denied in August 2003 and, in September 2003, defendants’ present attorneys were substituted. In April 2004, defendants moved to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cannon v. PutnamNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Bartoo v. BuellNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Wahl v. GrippenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Cerasaro v. CerasaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Gomez v. Needham Capital Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Johnson v. Title North, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Adderley v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- King v. Town CouncilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Svoboda v. Our Lady of Lourdes Memorial Hospital, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Burgos v. Darden Rests., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025