Legal Opinion

Watson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 9, 1994No. 92-02399PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Jemel Watson was charged with attempted robbery with a firearm and first degree felony murder. Two juries simultaneously tried Watson and a co-defendant, Gregory Tomingo. Cases approving the use of multiple juries have commended the system for furthering judicial economy but have cautioned that a trial judge must take great care to insure that each jury hears evidence relevant only to its defendant. See Velez v. State, 596 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Feeney v. State, 359 So.2d 569 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). Watson has appealed, contending that his jury heard testimony exculpating Tomin-go but…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. Gibson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  3. Velez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Feeney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  5. Fisher v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. SOURCETRACK, LLC v. Ariba, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  2. Estevez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. (HC) Myles v. MontgomeryDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. Heinly v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  5. The People v. Myles CA3California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API