Legal Opinion

State of Maine v. Danielle A. Beckwith

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 9, 2015No. Docket Pen-14-338PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHjelm, J.

[¶ 1] Danielle Beckwith appeals from a judgment of conviction for attempted theft by deception (Class D), 17-A M.R.S. §§ 152(1)(D), 354(1)(B)(4) (2014) and two counts of tampering with public records or information (Class D), 17-A M.R.S. § 456(1)(A) (2014), entered in the trial court (Romei, J.) after a bench trial. Beckwith argues that her conduct did not constitute a violation of 17-A M.R.S. § 456(1)(A) as interpreted in State v. Spaulding, 1998 ME 29, 707 A.2d 378, and that the evidence was insufficient to convict her of any of the charges. For the reasons stated below, we overrule…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Thomas P. WoodardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  3. State v. SpauldingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  4. State of Maine v. David W. TroySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Dana WilsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  2. State of Maine v. Steven EdwardsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024
  3. State of Maine v. Ezra Leblanc-SimpsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  4. State v. Leblanc-SimpsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  5. SWENSON, AARON CALEB v. the State of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API