Legal Opinion
Thacker v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided October 27, 1933No. A-8574PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was convicted of murder, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for life.
The evidence on the part of the state, in substance, shows that the defendant maintained an office and operating rooms in the Terminal building, Oklahoma City. In the early part of April, 1932, Ruth Hall, a single and unmarried woman, discovered she was pregnant, and in company with Helen Wright, a girl friend, went to the office of defendant; Helen Wright states that apparently, at the time they went to the office of defendant,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. RuleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
- Fowler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Clark v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Doser v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
- Rhine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
- Jenkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.