Legal Opinion

Peacock v. Oaks

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1891PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Osceola. (Judkins, J.) Oase. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendant in the Osceola circuit court, claiming damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained at the hands of her husband, Thomas H. Peacock, by means of his intoxication, resulting from liquors sold him by the defendant, who kept a saloon in the village of Reed City. She recovered verdict and judgment for $500. The defendant brings error, and files a brief in support of his allegations. The plaintiff presents no brief, and was not represented by counsel on the hearing in this Court.

The plaintiff in her declaration alleges that she was *579married to Thomas H.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stilson v. GibbsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Larzelere v. KirchgessnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Bell v. ZelmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Millross v. Plum Hollow Golf ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Weiser v. WelchMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Bowden v. VoorheisMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Doty v. PostalMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Lockard v. Van AlstyneMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API