Legal Opinion

Martinez-Marmol v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 31, 2013No. CR-12-190PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

2013 Ark. 436

ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT No. CR-12-190 Opinion Delivered October 31, 2013 GILBERTO MARTINEZ-MARMOL PRO SE MOTION FOR COPIES AT PETITIONER PUBLIC EXPENSE AND OTHER RELIEF [WASHINGTON COUNTY V. CIRCUIT COURT, 72CR-10-1599] STATE OF ARKANSAS RESPONDENT MOTION DENIED. PER CURIAM In 2012, petitioner Gilberto Martinez-Marmol was found guilty of three counts of rape. He was sentenced to an aggregate term of 300 months’ imprisonment. The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed. Martinez-Marmol v. State, 2013 Ark. App. 243. On July 1, 2013, petitioner filed the instant motion, seeking at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Reinstatement of Rule 37Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  3. Bradshaw v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Nooner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anthony v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API