Legal Opinion

McCreery v. Union Roofing & Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 18, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Clinton District Court.' — Hon. A. P. Barker, Judge. Action to recover damages to the estate of plaintiff’s intestate resulting from injuries causing his death,' alleged to have been due to the negligence of the defendant. There was a verdict for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcClain, J.

Plaintiff’s intestate was in defendant’s employ about its paper mill, engaged in picking and otherwise preparing rags to be fed through two rag cutting machines, and it appears that one of his duties as such employee was to assist, with other employees, in starting up the machines after they had been stopped by clogging, or for the purpose of being cleaned. These two rag cutting machines were located in a small building or annex, which was separated by the distance of at least 'thirty feet from *305the main building of defendant, and the machines were operated by belts connecting them with a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harvey v. City of ClarindaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  2. Sutton v. Des Moines Bakery Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. Gardner v. Waterloo Cream Separator Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. Vyse v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Maxson v. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. Primus v. Bellevue ApartmentsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  3. Hull v. Bishop-Stoddard CafeteriaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  4. Correll v. Williams & Hunting Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API