Legal Opinion

Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Burt

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 6, 1932No. 979PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFunderburk, J.

This 'suit involves a shipment of twenty-eight mules from Snyder to Fort Worth. Damages were claimed for the failure to deliver. one mule and for injuries to three others. It was alleged that the mules were delivered to the railway company at Snyder in good condition, and upon arrival of the shipment in Fort Worth there were only twenty-seven delivered, and three were bruised and crippled to such an extent that their marketable condition was depreciated in the sum, of $87.50, and the one lost was of the reasonable market value of $100. The plaintiffs, G. D. & G. L. Burt, recovered judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ConleyTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. ConleyTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Tidal Western Oil Corp. v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Kansas City v. Rochester Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Texas Pipe Line Co. v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ed S. Hughes Co. v. Clark Bros. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Golden v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API