Legal Opinion

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. THOMAS NATHANIEL TURRENTINE

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 2016No. SD34257PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY W. LYNCH, P. J.—OPINION AUTHOR

The trial court found Thomas Nathaniel Turrentine (“Defendant”) guilty of stealing, see section 573.030, 1 and property damage, see section, 569.100, 2 under principles of accomplice liability, see section 562.041. 3 On appeal, Defendant contends that the trial court erred: (1) “in finding [Defendant] guilty ... for the class C felony of stealing ... in that the State failed to adduce substantial evidence of the value of the computer that had been taken[;]” (2) “in finding [Defendant] guilty of property damage ... in that there was insufficient evidence to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. GrimSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. State of Missouri v. Amanda N. BazellSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  3. State v. BarnumSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  4. State v. SevereSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  5. State v. ForisterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  2. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. CHRISTA ELAINE MUELLERMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. State v. IngalsbeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API