STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. THOMAS NATHANIEL TURRENTINE
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GARY W. LYNCH, P. J.—OPINION AUTHOR
The trial court found Thomas Nathaniel Turrentine (“Defendant”) guilty of stealing, see section 573.030, 1 and property damage, see section, 569.100, 2 under principles of accomplice liability, see section 562.041. 3 On appeal, Defendant contends that the trial court erred: (1) “in finding [Defendant] guilty ... for the class C felony of stealing ... in that the State failed to adduce substantial evidence of the value of the computer that had been taken[;]” (2) “in finding [Defendant] guilty of property damage ... in that there was insufficient evidence to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. GrimSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- State of Missouri v. Amanda N. BazellSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
- State v. BarnumSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- State v. SevereSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
- State v. ForisterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
- STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. CHRISTA ELAINE MUELLERMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. IngalsbeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018